Theater District Citizens Advisory Committee

A year and a half ago, there was a call for a citizens advisory committee for the WRA to plan the theater district.

The following folks will serve on the committee:

Chairman John Brissette (yes, the very same individual who was pushing the hockey rink)
Vice Chair Jill Dagilis
Frank Carroll
Linda Cavaoli
Paul Demoga
Jack Donahue
Alex Dunn
Michelle Jones-Johnson
Alec Lopez
Stacey DeBoise Luster
Mable Millner
Deborah O’Malley
Hong Tran

So, many of the major downtown stakeholders (Becker College, MCPHS, YWCA, etc.) are represented in one way or the other on this board, excepting the Worcester Public Library.

There will be a meeting to discuss the urban renewal plan (not sure if it’s the same as the original plan) on Thursday, February 26 at 5:30 at the Levi Lincoln Chamber of City Hall.

A few other random notes:

As the Telegram reported [$], the WBDC has been renovating 20 Franklin Street, and is still looking for a tenant to run a restaurant in the first floor.  I wish them all the luck in the world, but the facade of the building is even uglier than the artist renderings.

We will, I’m sure, hear about the necessity of a 300-seat theater, so it’s good that the Paris Cinema has reared its head once again to remind us that we already have a small theater.

I’m interested to see how this ties in to the proposed residential/retail development in CitySquare.  You may recall [$] that there was supposed to be a restaurant and retail in the Unum building, but I don’t see either when I go by the building.  [Readers, feel free to correct me!]  There’s also nothing of street-level pedestrian interest at the St. Vincent Cancer Center or the WRTA Hub.

I have been reluctant to write about this because I say the same things over and over again, but we cannot keep making the same mistakes and expect that things will get better downtown.

Replacing an indoor mall with a bunch of buildings with no street-level retail/restaurants is not an improvement and will not increase pedestrian traffic or drive people downtown.

At this point, if there is any further development that doesn’t include vibrant street-level activity (not offices, and certainly not a glassed-in entrance to a black-box theater) we will have missed the whole point of getting rid of the mall.

If the retail/residential development in CitySquare loses the retail component, we will have lost.  If we take away parts of Main Street that have retail and replace them with something that’s not retail, we will have lost.

We are at an absolutely critical moment in downtown development.  Don’t let’s screw it up.

Advertisements

One thought on “Theater District Citizens Advisory Committee

  1. gayle says:

    I’m glad you mentioned that ‘So, many of the major downtown stakeholders (Becker College, MCPHS, YWCA, etc.) are represented in one way or the other on this board, excepting the Worcester Public Libra’ry.” and noted that hockey ring will be well represented and Library will not be.
    I have googled all members of the Parks and Recreation committee and note that they ALL have affiliations with sports leagues .
    well if all the important (the ones that have the money) , Advisory and City Committee’s are rigged so there are little new ideas that can be fully and openly vetted, it is no wonder little changes in Worcester. There are ways to set these up, i.e.13 people on this Advisory Committee than no more than 6 should be a stakeholder so more views-votes could be given etc

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s