I’m away from Worcester right now, though in a remarkably similar city. It’s got beautiful downtown buildings, an active anti-panhandling campaign, and plenty of streets with no street signs. It’s just like home — except for a distinct lack of hills and a skywalk from a hotel to a parking garage…
Because of that, I haven’t been able to write about so many of the things going on in the city (the parking study, the slots parlor, marijuana dispensaries) — but I hope to. Soon.
When we last left the Theatre District, we’d gotten a master plan that had little changes from the draft.
As Tracy notes, Councilor Eddy held the item about the Theater District Master Plan last Tuesday. (You can find more, including some quotes of my public comment, in Nick K’s column [$] from yesterday.)
I will just quote from Tracy’s blog about what could happen and what you should do if you care about the plan:
Councilor Eddy’s hold under privilege only lasts for a week. The Council has to do something with it tomorrow night. At this point, they can do four things:
- They can send the report on to Economic Development (the subcommittee that will hear this).
- They can hold the report for another week. That would take four councilors to vote in favor of the hold, at this point, as a personal privilege hold can only be done once per item per Councilor.
- They can send the report back to administration (as Nicole urged them to do last week) to incorporate public comment (or redo the process so that it begins from public comment).
- They can file the item, which is a nice way of saying, they can toss it out.In order for anything unusual to happen, the Council needs to hear from the public. Thus, should you have any concerns about access to the parking lot (or, indeed, any other aspects of the plan), you should get in touch with the Council.Better yet, there is a time for public testimony at the beginning of every Council meeting: attend tomorrow night’s meeting at 7 pm at City Council and voice your concerns.