Twitter is a Symptom, not the Problem

I’ve been disappointed, though not surprised, that the media — and especially Jordan Levy — have categorized the movement for Chief Gemme to resign as little more than a reaction to a few bad tweets.

If only it were so simple.

If only we were so unreasonable.

This is not a case of a few touchy liberals trying to violate someone’s first amendment rights.

This is a case of a police chief who acts as if he is above the law and a city government who continually tells him he is above the law.  To wit:

The press releases and the Twitter comments were just the latest missteps, and for some, they were the tipping point.

In a normal city, there would have been a public outcry long before we ever witnessed a Twitter war with a newspaper columnist.

But in Worcester, we have a citywide Stockholm Syndrome and collective amnesia that there was ever a safe city called Worcester that existed before Gary Gemme was police chief.

For those of you who can’t remember back eight years, Worcester was safe then.

Worcester has been pretty safe for at least twenty years.

In fact, the crime rate for the whole country is at its lowest point in decades.

There are no barbarians at the gates waiting for the moment Gary Gemme gets demoted back to captain so that they can run amok in the streets of Worcester.

We have been told that Gary Gemme is a good manager.

But the police — and the city — need more than just a good manager.  The chief should also be the intermediary between the civilian government and the armed constabulary — a servant of the former, while at the same time a leader of the latter.  It’s not a job for just any cop.  It requires a sense of diplomacy and a vigilant determination that his/her force should be a model of ethical policing and as transparent as humanly possible, to avoid allegations of police wrong-doing.

The chief is the public face of the police.  For those of us who do not attend neighborhood meetings or do not see a police officer in our day-to-day lives, the chief is the Worcester Police.

So when we see the police chief engaged in an extended war with “Miss Priss” while the T&G asks why the FBI put an asterisk next to the city’s rape statistics, we wonder what the priorities of the police really are.

When the police chief says “if you have a judge – and I’m not directing this at any particular judge,” and then proceeds to describe the judge he has mentioned by name, you wonder if all the stories of retaliation are true.

We do not need to choose between safety and transparency, or between security and civil rights.

We already have the safety and security.  We’ve had those for a very long time.

I am concerned that the chief believes that transparency is a hindrance to his work, and that the public does not have a right to know what is being done in their name.

I am concerned that the chief does not take people’s second and fifth amendment rights as seriously as he should as an officer of the law.

And I am concerned that people feel powerless.  Their elected officials will obviously not demand transparency or the upholding of civil rights.  In fact, most of those elected officials agree with the chief when he tells them that we need to sacrifice those things in service to safety.

This has nothing to do with Twitter and everything to do with a city’s chief executive and its elected officials who tell a man they have full confidence in him when they know that those under his command have violated a girl’s fifth amendment rights.

This has nothing to do with social media and everything to do with a chief who has told us he would be open and transparent while he flouts both the spirit and the letter of public records law.

If those who represent us are unwilling to say that this behavior is unacceptable, that the person who is supposed to uphold the law should also follow the law, then we must do it for ourselves.  Let’s all of us snap out of our apathy-induced amnesia and remember all of the things that have happened under Chief Gemme; let us not be afraid to remind our elected officials of this history of obstruction, mismanagement and petty reprisals.  Let us not re-elect anyone on the City Council who fails to hold the city manager accountable for patting Chief Gemme on the back with a hearty “attaboy” instead of the reproach he deserves.

4 thoughts on “Twitter is a Symptom, not the Problem

  1. Jim Kersten says:

    Thank you Nicole. Well said.

  2. Sean says:

    As always, right on the mark.

  3. doug says:

    Nicole as usual a great piece – we may not always see eye – to eye, but your logic here is on point. Gemme is a representative for the entire WPD, and as such has a responsibility to the people he has sworn an oath to. If he cannot keep that oath he must resign or be removed.

    • Sheila Mcarthy says:

      Nicole You forgot to mention the numerous acts of double standards by Gemme and his com padres. The embarrassment that they put Officer Paul Noone and his fellow Vice Squad officers through a couple of years ago was unforgivable. My husband and I have several close friends that are fine respectable police officers and firefighters .They all talk openly about the climate of corruption that Gemme has created and how he bullies any officer who stands up to him. Thank you for bringing it to light.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.