Tomorrow’s Council agenda has at least one really important item on the agenda:
12a. That the City Council of the City of Worcester hereby opposes the “Strengthening Our Schools” amendment to the state casino bill. (Rushton, Petty, O’Brien)
And at least one that makes you scratch your head:
10h. Request City Manager work with community partners to develop a gourmet food truck festival for May 2012. (Rushton)
But the difference between Boston and Worcester is that Boston actually encourages food vendors on their streets. Boston sponsored a contest for food trucks to occupy prime real estate. Boston lets you know — on the official city website — scheduled stops for food trucks. While the system isn’t perfect, that city is actively working to “foster an active food truck culture.”
Now, one could argue that Councilor Rushton’s item is a push in the right direction — that is, if we can warm folks up to the idea of food trucks, then we’d gain some support for normalizing street-vendor-hood in the city.
But these food truck fests do not just pull trucks out of the ether — they’re real, live businesses.
And if they come to Worcester, they’ll be told that they’re more than willing to visit as long as they don’t move here.
How many local food trucks would be able to participate in a food truck festival?
I don’t think many residents are interested in (just) another fest. Why should we settle for ‘gourmet’ food trucks once a year when we could be encouraging the culinary creativity of our own residents?