Let the scapegoating commence!

Last year, we were told that there were 122 dog bites reported in the city.  If we assume that the population of Worcester is about 180,000, that means that you have a .06% chance of getting bitten by a dog (or, at least, getting a bad enough bite that you’d report it).

According to the CDC, 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs every year in the US, and 800,000 seek medical attention.  That means that on the US as a whole, you have a 1.5% chance of being bitten and a .26% chance of needing medical attention from a dog bite.

Which means that Worcester seems safer, dog-bite-wise, than the country as a whole.

We were also told that 56 of those 122 bites were from pit bulls.  That means you’ve got a .03% chance of being bitten by a pit bull if you’re a Worcester resident.

As a result of these shocking statistics, the City Council decided to make sure that pit bulls are muzzled when off their property, that pit bull owners pay an additional licensing fee, and other measures that do absolutely nothing to stop biting incidents.

In anticipation of tomorrow’s implementation of the pit bull ordinance, WorcesterWired had a long article about a woman who was attacked by a pit bull.  The Telegram [behind the paywall] also reports that a pit bull was stabbed to death after attacking another dog.

What neither of these articles tells us is if the dogs were unneutered males.

The CDC says that “there is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.”  The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) can tell you that “intact males are … involved in 70 to 76% of reported dog bite incidents.”  (I recommend reading the AVMA’s A community approach to dog bite prevention for a more comprehensive discussion of this topic.)

We don’t know how many dog bites in Worcester were caused by dogs off their leashes (because this is, of course, under the original ordinance).  We don’t know how many dog bites were caused by dogs on their owner’s property (which wouldn’t be affected by either ordinance).  We don’t know how many dog bites were caused by unneutered/intact male dogs. 

We don’t know any of these statistics because the City Council didn’t want to consider them when drafting this ordinance.  We continue to get news stories with “pit bull” in the title, instead of “intact male” or “unleashed dog” or “unlicensed dog” or any of a number of factors that are just as relevant to the issue of dog bites.

We need statistics to be kept that don’t just include the breed of the dog, but the location of the attack, whether the dog is licensed or unlicensed, fixed or not, healthy or unhealthy.  We need a news media more fully committed to giving the public an accurate depiction of the factors that lead to a dog bite.

We need a massive public education campaign about spaying and neutering dogs.  Frankly, I think we need to start identifying unneutered dogs in the same way we’re currently identifying pit bulls and offering real incentives (not $3 off a dog license) to those who spay and neuter their pets.  We need a thoughtful, rational approach that is lasting, not a quick fix that doesn’t have long-term goals (like increasing spay/neuter rates).

I know that what we need and what we’ll get are two very different things.  But a girl can dream!

6 thoughts on “Let the scapegoating commence!

  1. […] pit bull was stabbed to death in Worcester.[2:50] We are still not convinced that the city’s anti-pit bull laws are helpful.[3:55] The eighth of nine puppies stolen from the Sterling shelter is back.[5:20] […]

  2. Trish W. says:

    Here, here! Great breakdown of so many of the points people are missing. I don’t have a dog, currently, but I agree that the measures that are being taken are ridiculous and really, don’t address the issues, most of which are dumb-arse, irresponsible owners. And it is ridiculous that the media is focusing on the breed rather than all the other important issues – especially being an intact male dog.

    Hmm… and what’s the statical percentage of getting stabbed in Worcester? Not less than .03% right?

  3. twopath says:

    …would someone please fork over the name of the state rep who brought the ordinance to the city council table in the first place….I had copies of all related articles until I had to go out of state for a few months on a family emergency… in one of the articles, this state “representative,” or whatever title is on the wooden door to his corner office was quoted as saying that the ordinance wasn’t about the dogs but the people who own the dogs, then, there seemed to be a shift in his words about inner-city people, drug dealers, etc… I will tap into my e-mail for any further comments on this post and I need to know how to access past news articles and very specific searches for free (i.e. not through the local paper website who wants a dollar for every click)…. if Breed Specific Legislation is referring to people, and not dogs, there’s gonna be a stink….

  4. Pam Toomey says:

    City Counselor William Eddy is the man who proposed and pushed for this ordinance. Note: in the zip code 01603 that is included in his district, there are 135 sex offenders. City counselors have stated this is a way of targeting irresponsible citizens, i.e thugs and drug dealers. Ironic that making it known that in the vicinity of so many schools there are so many sex offenders is not priority, but a look of dog is. There are a few pits in my neighborhood who are all VERY well behaved, mine included. I brought my dog to meet him and he wouldn’t be bothered with her, a therapy dog. So sad that a well behaved, upstanding citizen (though k-9) who wants to help people and her owner are unwelcome in his community.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.